Compatibility route: WorthCompatibility route

Which models are practical on MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch?

Current lens: Coding. Rank models by lowest local cost, while keeping throughput, fit, local cost, and evidence on the same sheet.

This route presets the rankings around local-cost reading rather than splitting worth into its own product.

Snapshot

Top model: Llama 3.2 1B

50 viable rows · 21 benchmark-backed · 229.0 tok/s at Q8_0.

Rows
432
Models
55
Macs
29
Benchmark-backed
21

Catalog current through April 22, 2026. Benchmark evidence through April 27, 2026.

Query setup

Audit evidence

Choose a Mac first, then narrow by lens, quant target, runtime, and ranking preference.

Results

Model matches for MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch

Sorted by lowest local cost · 50 viable rows · 21 benchmark-backed

Viable rows
50
Benchmark-backed rows
21
#1EstimatedLow confidence

Llama 3.2 1B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output229.0 tok/s
Prompt3620.7 tok/s
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeLlamafile
Headroom124.8 GB
Context131k
Local cost$2.50
Detail Open

Capability

1.24B dense · general-purpose

Evidence

Estimated from nearby benchmark coverage, not a direct match Speed is estimated from nearby benchmark coverage rather than this exact machine-and-quant match. Best runtime hint: Llamafile.

Coverage

No direct benchmark rows yet

Speed is estimated, so this cost read is provisional.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality124.8 GB131k229.0 tok/sLlamafileEstimated
Q6_K High quality125.0 GB131k229.0 tok/sLlamafileEstimated
Q5_K_M High quality125.1 GB131k229.0 tok/sLlamafileEstimated
Q4_K_M Balanced quality125.3 GB131k229.0 tok/sLlamafileEstimated
#2EstimatedLow confidence

Qwen 3 0.6B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output184.4 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeLM Studio
Headroom125.4 GB
Context10k
Local cost$3.10
Detail Open

Capability

0.6B dense · general-purpose

Evidence

Estimated from nearby benchmark coverage, not a direct match Speed is estimated from nearby benchmark coverage rather than this exact machine-and-quant match. Best runtime hint: LM Studio.

Coverage

No direct benchmark rows yet

Speed is estimated, so this cost read is provisional.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality125.4 GB33k184.4 tok/sLM StudioEstimated
Q6_K High quality125.5 GB33k370.0 tok/sLM StudioEstimated
Q5_K_M High quality125.6 GB33k370.0 tok/sLM StudioEstimated
Q4_K_M Balanced quality125.7 GB33k370.0 tok/sLM StudioEstimated
#3Trusted referenceLow confidence

Gemma 4 E2B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output158.0 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeMLX
Headroom120.9 GB
Context131k
Local cost$3.62
Detail Open

Capability

5.1B dense · tuned for coding

Evidence

Direct trusted-reference benchmark coverage on this hardware class Speed is backed by trusted-reference benchmark coverage. Most common runtime in the evidence is MLX.

Coverage

1 direct benchmark row

Default 10% utilization napkin math.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality120.9 GB131k158.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q6_K High quality121.8 GB131k158.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q5_K_M High quality122.4 GB131k158.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q4_K_M Balanced quality123.1 GB131k158.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
#4EstimatedLow confidence

Qwen3.5-4B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output148.0 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeMLX
Headroom122.0 GB
Context262k
Local cost$3.87
Detail Open

Capability

4B dense · tuned for coding

Evidence

Estimated from nearby benchmark coverage, not a direct match Speed is estimated from nearby benchmark coverage rather than this exact machine-and-quant match. Best runtime hint: MLX.

Coverage

No direct benchmark rows yet

Speed is estimated, so this cost read is provisional.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality122.0 GB262k148.0 tok/sMLXEstimated
Q6_K High quality122.7 GB262k148.0 tok/sMLXEstimated
Q5_K_M High quality123.2 GB262k148.0 tok/sMLXEstimated
Q4_K_M Balanced quality123.7 GB262k148.0 tok/sMLXEstimated
#5Trusted referenceLow confidence

Llama 3.1 8B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output138.0 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeMLX
Headroom118.0 GB
Context131k
Local cost$4.15
Detail Open

Capability

8.03B dense · general-purpose

Evidence

Direct trusted-reference benchmark coverage on this hardware class Speed is backed by trusted-reference benchmark coverage. Most common runtime in the evidence is MLX.

Coverage

1 direct benchmark row

Default 10% utilization napkin math.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality118.0 GB131k138.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q6_K High quality119.4 GB131k138.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q5_K_M High quality120.3 GB131k138.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q4_K_M Balanced quality121.4 GB131k138.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
#6EstimatedLow confidence

Qwen 3 4B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output135.0 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeOllama
Headroom122.0 GB
Context33k
Local cost$4.24
Detail Open

Capability

4.02B dense · general-purpose

Evidence

Estimated from nearby benchmark coverage, not a direct match Speed is estimated from nearby benchmark coverage rather than this exact machine-and-quant match. Best runtime hint: Ollama.

Coverage

No direct benchmark rows yet

Speed is estimated, so this cost read is provisional.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality122.0 GB33k135.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
Q6_K High quality122.7 GB33k135.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
Q5_K_M High quality123.1 GB33k135.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
Q4_K_M Balanced quality123.7 GB33k135.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
#7EstimatedLow confidence

Gemma 3 4B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output132.0 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeOllama
Headroom121.7 GB
Context131k
Local cost$4.34
Detail Open

Capability

4.3B dense · adjacent fit for coding

Evidence

Estimated from nearby benchmark coverage, not a direct match Speed is estimated from nearby benchmark coverage rather than this exact machine-and-quant match. Best runtime hint: Ollama.

Coverage

No direct benchmark rows yet

Speed is estimated, so this cost read is provisional.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality121.7 GB131k132.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
Q6_K High quality122.5 GB131k132.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
Q5_K_M High quality122.9 GB131k132.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
Q4_K_M Balanced quality123.5 GB131k132.0 tok/sOllamaEstimated
#8Trusted referenceLow confidence

Gemma 4 E4B

MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB 16-inch · 128GB · $5,399 · Portable

Output128.0 tok/s
Prompt
QuantQ8_0
RuntimeMLX
Headroom118.0 GB
Context131k
Local cost$4.47
Detail Open

Capability

8B dense · tuned for coding

Evidence

Direct trusted-reference benchmark coverage on this hardware class Speed is backed by trusted-reference benchmark coverage. Most common runtime in the evidence is MLX.

Coverage

1 direct benchmark row

Default 10% utilization napkin math.

Quant ladder and fit detail
QuantQualityHeadroomContextSpeedRuntimeEvidence
Q8_0 Reference quality118.0 GB131k128.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q6_K High quality119.4 GB131k128.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q5_K_M High quality120.3 GB131k128.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference
Q4_K_M Balanced quality121.4 GB131k128.0 tok/sMLXTrusted reference

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Worth

These answers stay tied to the live workspace defaults for this compatibility route, so the copy explains the same sort order and query framing the table is using.

What does the Worth route optimize for?
Worth defaults to lowest local cost for the selected Mac. It helps you compare which models deliver the most practical local inference for the machine cost you already carry.
Does Worth replace API cost modeling?
No. Worth is a local-cost reading, not a full finance model. It is best used to shortlist practical local options before you compare them against your cloud usage and break-even assumptions.
Why can a slower model rank above a faster one on Worth?
Worth favors local cost efficiency first. A slower model can still rank higher if it gives you a materially cheaper or lighter-weight local option on the same Mac.